(The whole book, as of November 19, 2009, can be had
here in a 8,161,739 -byte
PDF file.)
The version above has some additions to Chapter 2, which
is pre-calculus stuff but might help students to learn to
parse functions better. I have been experimenting with
"diagramming functions" in a flow-chart manner.
Numbered pages 138-145 (add about 20 to get "physical pages")
introduce this, and use it for some of the usual
"simple" transforms of functions (shifts, reflections,
contractions/dilations). I experimented with \ovalnode's
in pstricks for these. Some later pages have earlier
experimental graphics for more complicated functions
(which are combinations of functions). The links below are
presently out of date for this topic. I hope to be done
with this pre-calculus stuff before too much longer, but
it is currently where I am inspired to work, so I better
follow that inspiration while it's there.
This page contains excerpts from my calculus textbook project.
This is very much a work in progress, though some sections are nearly complete
and have been used in my courses. Comments can be sent to me at
michael.dougherty@swosu.edu.
Check back for updates periodically. Files below are current as
of November 30, 2008, reflecting some recent progress.
The whole book file will often be more current.
In case you're wondering why this book is different, I'll give a few
quick reasons.
Well, that's
not quite right. You can, for the most part, read the book
without a lot of frustration because it's spelled out
for you in more detail than usual, though it never hurts
to have that paper and pen ready to clarify things for
yourself. And of course, exercises are included (not enough
yet) and those are usually nontrivial, requiring
a creative effort and lots of paper on the part of the
reader if the material is to be truly learned.
The usual technique for a calculus book is the opposite,
in my opinion leaving out
too much detail--or trying to pack too much into each
of the (consequently)
insufficiently numerous examples--and thus requiring the student to
mull over points for a very long, frustrating time.
That's OK and time-tested, particularly for students who
have the time and energy to work through the explanations
and exercises, often with the help of an instructor
or teaching assistant. However, students who don't
have the tolerance for incomplete explanations
but who might make fine students if
more is spelled out for them might find a resource that
fits them better here. Furthermore, even the former
group of students often leave calculus with some
glaring misconceptions despite their persistence,
and a more expository presentation should benefit them
as well.
Note that the text is first formatted in LaTeX, which generates a
DVI file, which is then converted to Postscript, and then to PDF
with ps2pdf. A good program for rendering the
PDF files for the screen is Adobe's Acrobat Reader (see link at bottom),
though there are others, particularly gv and evince for Linux.
Graphics are handled almost entirely through the PSTricks package under
LaTeX. Thanks so much to that community, particularly Herbert Voss
for all the great work done on Timothy Van Zandt's original
PSTricks package. See also notes at the bottom of the
Chapter 12 commentary, at the bottom of this page.
Actually, after a long attempt in April, 2009
I gave up and borrowed some
graphics from "wikimedia" for conic sections at the
front end of Chapter 12. Sigh.
--MMD
One thing I plan to have different about my approach is that
I will mix some graphing problems in with Chapters 3 and 4, so that
I do not have to have omnibus sections of this chapter devoted to
graphing. Graphs reflecting the sign of f '(x) do not
have to wait until this chapter, though the proof that
positive derivative means increasing function will be done here.
This will have related rates, MVT applications (f ' in some
range, what is the range in which we can find f given
a starting point?), max/min problems, etc. For now,
don't expect much here. 328,240 bytes.
At the moment there is an "artifact" hyperbolic section, that
is just beginning, and likely to end up somewhere else.
One key here is that I am very careful
in choosing the method for substitution.
The short-cut, completing-the-chain-rule-derivative method is avoided
here because it is a dead end, and nearly useless for advanced
methods of the next chapter. Why authors continue to advance this
as the method to use here is beyond me.
Instead, my method here (and of course I'm not claiming I
invented this
but that I'm choosing this mehtod) is to replace everything in
the original integral with u and du terms. I show
the reader the other methods but focus on the method I believe
has more use in their future studies, such as trigonometric
and "miscellaneous" substitution.
See also notes on the next
two chapters. 450,523 bytes. Note: this is getting a lot of updates lately because I'm
using it in a class I'm teaching, so see the file at the
top (whole book) for the latest.
I'm maybe 3/4-finished here with the examples and explanations.
Parts, partial fractions and
trig integrals just need polishing and problems. Trig
substitution
is a new section that has seen some improvement over the
last year but should probably be augmented. And they all
need more problems!
Tables and other techniques not yet begun.
Also some techniques for more general, uglier
rational integrands in the spirit of
Edwards & Penney will hopefully appear here. 496,134 bytes.
Hmm, Summer is now over and I haven't
done anything yet. Maybe a Fall project.
Hmm, it seems to be almost the Spring Semester. We'll see.
After consulting with respected colleagues, I finalized (I
think) the
decision to keep this after the advanced
integration techniques, presently
Chapter 7. My one-time chairman Dr. Gerard East in particular made
the case that students
just don't get enough integration practice immediately
after the advanced techniques until
multivariable stuff or differential equations
otherwise. In his experience, when the
applications follow
the techniques, students "know how to integrate"
when they do applications and then later multivariables,
whereas they forget otherwise.
In other words, the applications reinforce the techniques.
Now any good author who does applications before
advanced techniques also scatters some new applications
throughout the advanced techniques chapter, but realistically,
the instructors and students are concentrating on the techniques
and, while any applied
problems assigned might reinforce the applications well,
and the techniques somewhat, the techniques themselves are
already a "black hole" of time and energy, for which
further applications are often a
distraction (therefore discarded)
for students and instructors who are mortal.
Presently 26,579 bytes.
Special Thank-Yous: I have had a couple of people send me
edits that I have not had time to incorporate. I have them saved though,
and will include you in my acknowledgments when the time comes.
If you've sent me feedback regarding this project, this means
you.
: This got a big boost
from my Calc 2 course in Spring 2008. I haven't looked
at it lately so it's tough to comment, but I liked what
was emerging so far. 606,583 bytes.
I'm not 100% sure that I will follow the usual outline. Many professors have indicated they would like to see power series earlier, and later worry about convergence in that context. I may experiment to see if this and Chapter 12 can be consolidated in a respectable manner.
But so far I seem to be following the standard outline, more or less. 373,755 bytes.
This was actually my first chapter written, as I wanted something like it for a course I was teaching. The style is not as refined (perhaps). I recently replaced all graphics (formerly MathematicaTM and LaTeX Picture) with pstricks-generated graphics.
There is a good chance large parts of this will be overhauled. Or else earlier parts of the book will need to be adjusted so students are prepared for the spirit of the early presentation here, such as earlier introduction of the idea that if f(x) and g(x) are approximately equal, so to some extent will be their definite integrals (depending upon the intervals, etc.). There is some good, even original stuff here, but some of those parts read more like a seminar for undergraduates in alternative perspectives on Taylor poynomials.
To be sure, the usual, "let's algebraically find a polynomial that matches all the derivatives of f at x=a" is perhaps too far removed from normalcy for most novice calculus students. I like to think my method of working from more and more refined hypothetical assumptions placed on the function f (f constant, then instead f ' constant, then f ' ' constant, etc.) and deriving polynomials by integration--which also gives good intuition into the reasonableness of the error terms--more motivating to students. 739,413 bytes.