Routes of Administration --
Once absorbed, the drugs are distributed throughout the body (not just in the brain). Recall that drugs may be metabolised by the liver before ever reaching the brain, thus decreasing their potential action (when this occurs immediately after oral ingestion it is called the first pass effect). It may also be absorbed in various sites in the body, making it appear to be very widespread throughout the body with corresponding lower blood levels (recall that the Volume of distribution is an indirect measurement of the distribution of a drug). Finally recall that drugs are often not selective in their site of action -- while a drug of abuse may be producing euphoria in the CNS, it may also be causing potentially severe damage to other organs.
Before the drug can achieve its desired effect, it obviously must be distributed to the brain. In order to be absorbed into the CNS a drug must cross the blood brain barrier. Recall that this refers to an anatomical arrangement of tightly joined endothelial cells that comprise the blood vessels to the CNS. This decreases the passage of substances from the blood to the brain. In order to cross the endothelial wall, a drug must be very lipophilic and cross the cells lining the vessels by passive diffusion.
NERVOUS SYSTEM -- Site of action for Drugs of Abuse
Recall that the nervous system is composed of both central and peripheral
components that perform specific functions.
Within the CNS, the brain is divided into two portions (actually, there
are many classifications of brain parts -- for the purposes of this class,
the following discussion is particularly useful) -- an evolutionary older
brain (lower brain) and a more advanced newer (higher) brain.
The higher brain (cerebrum, cerebral cortex) is the portion that permits and controls speech, reason, and the ability to create -- higher level functions.
NOTE that often the lower brain may predominate -- the need to survive is often more powerful than the need to write poetry!
RECALL that nerves within and without the CNS synthesise, store and
release specific neurotransmitters (NT). When a nerve is activated,
a process involving the exocytosis of storage granules containing the NT
begins and the NT is released from this presynaptic nerve into a small
area called the synapse. This synapse is between the releasing nerve
and either an organ or a second nerve (the post synaptic site of action).
Once released the NT will bind to a receptor on the post synaptic site
and elicit some action. Once this has been accomplished the NT will
either 1) be metabolised or
2) be taken back up into the pre-synapse where it is either metabolised
or re-stored for future use.
RECALL that the receptors on the post-synaptic site in part determine the effect of the NT. The number or nature of these receptors may be altered (up or down regulated) in response to how much NT is available and acting at the receptor.
ALSO RECALL that there exists drugs that either mimic the actions of the NT at the receptor (agonists) or block the effect of the NT (antagonists). Additionally, some drugs may specifically block the re-uptake (re-storage) of the NT.
When a drug is taken for an extended period, it may become less effective over time. This phenomenon is called tolerance and may exist in several forms.
Pharmacodynamic Tolerance -- this refers most often to the change in receptors described above, when an agonist activates receptors more than normal and the body thinks it must have too many receptors -- so the receptors are "down regulated" or reduced in number, lessening the effect of the drug.
Acute Tolerance -- Tachyphylaxis -- this type of tolerance occurs very rapidly (often with one dose of a drug -- the second dose is not as effective) and is most often associated with depletion of the NT that mediates the effect of the drug.
Behavioural Tolerance -- this type, as defined by the text, is when a person may appear tolerant for a brief period before the effects of the drug re-exert themselves. This is more likely to due to a sudden release of adrenaline, which may temporarily override the effects of the drug. This is not a true tolerance.
Reverse Tolerance -- the situation, as described by the text, when once tolerance has developed a physiologic change occurs that obliterates the tolerance and the effects of the drug may re-exert themselves. NOTE that this is not true tolerance, either in effect or mechanism.
Inverse Tolerance --also not a true tolerance -- is described by the book as a situation where the drug may not exert an effect for a long period and then the effect will suddenly appear. The example used by the book is the ability of cocaine to "kindle" seizures after a long period of seizure-free use. Pharmacologically this ability is more appropriately described as a process of sensitisation (becoming more sensitive to the effects of a drug) rather than desensitisation that more accurately describes tolerance.
NOTE that tolerance may be selective -- a good example of this is the fact that tolerance develops relatively rapidly to the euphoria produced by opiates -- however it does not develop as quickly to the respiratory depressant actions and as the abuser uses more drug to achieve the same level of euphoria he depresses the respiration even further.
Psychic Dependence -- The person THINKS they need the drug -- this is a major component of continued use -- the "reward" aspect of drug abuse discussed later.
Withdrawal -- This usually describes the physical effects of stopping a drug. As noted above with physical dependence, the body must adjust to the absence of a drug that has been taken over time. Often, the effects of withdrawing a drug are the opposite of the drug itself. (That is if a drug caused constipation -- the withdrawal effect would be diarrhoea.) The text classifies three types of withdrawal
Purposive withdrawal -- this is not true withdrawal. Although it may intentional (conscious) or unintentional (unconscious) on the part of the patient, it is a "faking" of withdrawal in order to get sympathy, support, or more drug. Often this "withdrawal" will present with signs and symptoms that would not be present with true physical withdrawal.
Protracted withdrawal -- This is often referred to as "flashbacks". Again, this is not a true withdrawal. However, as discussed in the text it is the situation where, after a long period of abstinence, the former user experience and unpleasant sensation upon some stimulus that is associated with the drug use. An appropriate analogy would be "post-traumatic stress" for addicts. NOTE: This may represent a component of the psychological withdrawal that a user may experience.
RECALL that these drugs as acting in places other that the CNS. They often produce a wide range of side effects that, in non-abusing individuals, would be considered bothersome, but that the abuser will tolerate to achieve the desired effect. Also recall that many additional actions of the drug may be detrimental to the health of the abuser.
In the drug abuse arena, there are many levels of use. These may range from
The text defines drug ABUSE as the "continued use of a drug despite negative consequences". NOTE that this definition could include the social user or experimentor as easily as it does the habitual user.
The compulsion component of drug addiction may include, but is not limited,
to the following
1) spend the majority of time using/getting/thinking of the drug
2) continue use in presence of adverse life, health, mental, or physical
consequences
3) deny the existence of a problem or "can stop at anytime"
4) after physical withdrawal, still have tendency/desire to use again
There are three primary theories of addiction:
Behavioural/Environmental Model (including the Developmental Model) -- this model supports the view that actions taken by family during early childhood development, the home/living environment, and/or the behaviours of family or self will result in addiction. The addiction is a result of emotional or physical stress (such as abuse as a child, living conditions, work) causing the person to seek an escape from that environment (also included in this model are inadequacies in self-worth, where the drug makes them more important or to feel better about themselves -- a result of subconscious memories of emotional abuse as a child) or peer pressure to join in the abuse of drugs (a choice on the part of the abuse to persist in that environment). The addiction will usually follow the sequence of events that begins with abstinence or non-use and progress through experimentation, social/occasional use, habituation, abuse, and finally addiction. There are studies that support this theory and those that refute it.
Academic Model -- This is the older and more pharmacologically based theory of addiction. The theory states that the drug, through its actions on the reward/pleasure centres of the brain, will alter the neurochemistry such that the desire to use again is stronger either for the euphoria produced or the perception of reward, leading to abuse through re-inforcement, physical dependence, and psychological dependence. Again, there is a strong record of animal research to support this theory at least in part (where upon repeated exposure, animals will choose a drug over food or water, even in the presence of aversive stimuli such as pain) and studies that fail to correlate the abuse with the drug.
In all probability, it is a combination of all three models that results in drug abuse and addiction. Namely